ABOUT THE SITE
First and foremost........
Welcome to my site
I feel its very important to be upfront with people so I thought id get straight into that.
You will find the below disclosure on the top of every page.
WELCOME TO MY SITE AND HERE IS MY DISCLOSURE
PLEASE VISIT "ABOUT THE SITE" FIRST AND THEN VISIT "RELIABLE INFORMATION".
MY INTENTION IS NOT TO PROVE ANYTHING. THE SITE IS JUST A PLACE TO SAVE MY RESEARCH AND CREATE AWARENESS OF THE TOPIC. I WANTED TO PROVIDE A RESOURCE TO EXPLAIN MY POINT OF VIEW TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY INSTEAD OF CONSTANTLY RETYPING AND PROVIDING LINKS. ALL REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED. DO NOT BELIEVE ME AND RESEARCH THE BELOW FOR YOURSELF.
IF SOMETHING IS MY OPINION I WILL STATE IT OTHERWISE I ATTEMPT TO JUST LAY OUT THE INFORMATION FOUND. I MAY PROVIDE MY CONCLUSION AT THE END BUT ULTIMATELY ITS UP TO YOU MAKE YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT.
USE DISCERNMENT WHEN READING ANY INFORMATION SOURCE.
I wanted to make that very clear to anyone who reads anything on the site.
That said I would also like to mention that the content on this page in particular is mostly my opinion. It’s my attempt to explain a few reasons for the site and provide a feel for how the content was intended to come across but first a quick over view of the site, its layout and concept.
UPDATE 23/6/16
I started this site and then began to realize it was very time consuming using the site (internet connection, Picture addition etc) so I have made very little progress on the content and have simply added the page titles etc ready for an eventual copy and paste from my offline docs. If you require any information that is missing please contact me
THE BASICS
Feel free to copy images, links and content of any kind.
-Navigation menu is at the top of each page. I have tried to group related subjects but many of the subjects cross over. If you hover the mouse over each title in the menu additional tabs appear. There are no further tabs after the second level.
- Due to several subjects crossing over I would suggest using the Site map over the Main Navigation menu. Each Subject has its own main title which is listed in alphabetical order down the page and then each related subject is listed under it.
-You will find a Disclosure statement at the top of each page. Just my way of being upfront with people but the main point is to not read any of the content here and make a decision with it. What I would like to see everyone doing is after hearing something, seeing something or reading something (even if we don’t agree with it upfront) we then take that information without dismissing it and then verifying everything ourselves without the need to ridicule another person’s opinion or belief. We will not always come to the same conclusion but we will have the closest thing possible to a well-informed society. It’s Ok to have different opinions but let’s understand and discuss why that is the case.
-All source references are provided. Links to sources are indicated by blue text or blue numbers in brackets. Generally for names of people / places / terms or objects the text will be the link.
The numbers EG: ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) do not continue to count up like a regular reference section at the bottom of a Wikipedia page but indicate how many references I found for what has just been said. Each number is a link to the source which may be an article, website, book, video etc. The intention is that anyone reading can click the links and the pages will open in a new tab which they can read for themselves without losing their position.
During my research I have taken screen shots of the source pages which are saved in word documents along with the links which are also backed up in my bookmarks and I often record the screen with Screencast-o-matic for the entire time I’m at the computer so I have a reference even if things have been removed from the original site or the information has changed.
I have also tried to keep the information as short and concise as possible so have much more detail recorded on the word documents. I feel that it is important we read the content for ourselves, learn the information, retain the information and make our own conclusion based on our understanding of it. If you would like to hear my perspective on the subject I have include a link at the bottom of each page that will take you to another page with my conclusions, ideas, more detail on how I found out about the topic etc.
From this point on If you’re not interested in my opinion and just wanted to get straight into it the details please make your next stop be either the Reliable information page or the Site map.
I have a few reasons for creating the site but the first 2 were the inspiration and remain my primary reasons.
1) A place to point friends and family to help them understand the subjects.
So if you have stumbled onto this site I still welcome you but please understand my intention was not to prove anything to you.
If I have pointed you here please know that it was still not my intention to prove anything to you, I simply want to share this information, provide something that shows why I have my opinion and let you research further if you so choose.
At first I didn't intend on anyone other than friends or family reading any of this and pages were password protected.
While developing the site I saw reason to remove the protection.
I have a small circle of people that are close to me and while a vast majority of people may think the subjects are funny or ridiculous I think many are important.
I found the subjects are difficult to explain in conversation and often require an understanding of the big picture to make any sense.
To see the big picture requires reading a lot of information and making the connections between each subject.
So I started the site as a resource for family and friends knowing all the subjects have been researched and I’m not just getting my information from the “tin foil hatter” website on the internet or from “that side” of YouTube.
Because I have researched the subjects there is a good chance I can answer many of the questions they may have.
I also feel that many sites and YouTube channels covering the subjects don’t do themselves or the people they are trying to inform any favours in the way the information is presented and I wouldn’t want anyone close to me dismissing any subject because the first thing they saw about it was a person ranting in a way that could only be seen as “crazy”
2) A place to save my research
I started out covering subjects I consider important and a few subjects I may just find interesting but then there are the subjects I never considered but while researching I found they were closely tied with others.
I quickly realized there is a lot of information and I wanted to save it all.
Before starting the site I had “looked into” many of the topics over the years and a little more than 3 months ago I started to gather this information together but still had nothing substantial to show for it.
I had no structured information and very little was recorded other than a large amount of bookmarks on my browser.
Because there was no structure I was starting to have trouble finding the resources like links or documents.
I also found it difficult to add new information or revise it if required.
I also think it’s extremely important to revisit things we know / believe / understand when new information is presented and see if the subject still holds water.
Having this site gives me access to all of the information and documents anytime, anywhere.
and see if the subject still holds water.
Having this site gives me access to all of the information and documents anytime, anywhere.
As I was building the site and gained better understanding of the subjects I became confident enough to discuss the subjects with Facebook groups and I realized this resource could also be helpful in other ways like......
3) A Place to point like minded individuals and share my findings.
Obviously people join a social media group or like a page because they are interested in the content.
The participation however can vary greatly.
Some simply read the information.
Some may comment on occasion while others are very active in discussions.
Then there are the active contributors. The people that post the information and make the group / page worth following.
Most of these people are simply trying to share their ideas, opinions or findings.
This will now be my way of sharing with them. Rather than constantly retyping information I can simply provide a link to any subject on the site.
I will also research their findings myself and add it to my information with the intention of having a larger knowledge base in one spot and improving its quality.
We all have different skills and thought processes so sharing our findings benefits everyone involved.
It was not considered at first but I ended up with YouTube account as I found I was having to make videos to include on the site and since then I have started a Facebook account so if you happen to be one of those likeminded people then please pop into
Or see the Contact Information page
4) Create Awareness
I'm sure you may have found we are not all like-minded. I have stated I'm not here to prove anything but what I have done is plant a seed.
That may sound underhanded but the seed can grow into a large tree if watered or will not sprout at all. That's up to you.
Everyone has an "Ah Ha" moment........... The trigger will be different for all of us.
Maybe the information here didn't do that for you.
I'm happy with knowing that even just a glance at the subject title will create awareness of it.
One day you might see or hear something and recall seeing it somewhere before and be more inclined to look into it further.
You might see something here and think it’s completely crazy. A few days from now you could be talking to a friend you say
"You should see the crazy things I was reading the other day" and they might look into it, even if it’s to have a laugh.
The more it’s seen, the more it’s discussed and more people become aware of the subject.
Regardless of whether people agree or not I think that more people aware that the subject exists is for the better
5) A Quick reference point for subjects
I found that I was constantly retyping the information, going through my bookmarks to provide links or searching for previous posts.
Now all I have to do is provide a link to one of my pages.
I don't really agree with providing links because I feel the journey is far more important than the destination.
The journey is often critical to understand the destination and opens up other paths to travel. Personally I have found that I can now read an article on something and will see a name / company / date / product / event etc that is familiar so I look into the subject much closer.
But it seems every person wants that link as proof of what you are saying and if it’s not provided it’s like you’re making things up.
I understand why this is the case as there are many people out there who may outright lie or deliberately attempt to deceive others but I wonder if we forget that we have this information at our finger tips and perhaps if we all looked for verification ourselves we would broaden the sources for this information rather than take the shortcut and possibly make choices on that small piece of information.
If looking for the information requires lots of time and effort, especially if our personal interest in the subject is low then will we look much further?
What If the subject conflicts with our current opinions or beliefs……Will we even look at all? Even if we were provided with several sources…….Would we look?
Obviously it’s better to provide your references if possible but I hope the references are also confirmed in some other way before decisions are made.
For a very large majority of the subjects here you will not find the “proof” in any one document and if you do…….is the document legitimate?
It would, for example be nice of NASA to include on their home page “We faked the moon landing” but that is not going to be the case. We can however look at all of their sites, all of the information contained or lack thereof, Watch all of the videos, check the background of the company or employees, read up on and understand the science to the best of our ability and then make a well informed decision as to the validity of a statement like “They faked the landings”. Others interpretation of the same material may lead them to a different conclusion but as long as we have done all we can to assess the statement for ourselves then that’s all that matters.
People may ask “who is correct then?”
I’m not going to answer that here. I think it’s more important to understand why we get 2 results from the same content. Please read the Reliable Information page and consider why this is so common. In my opinion we should all approach every source of information with an open mind, an unbiased approach and a healthy dose of skepticism, especially if there is anyone at all claiming that it’s incorrect and with even greater attention if there are claims we are being lied to. Sometimes we need to read between the lines so let’s firstly make it as may lines as possible and also use our other senses to confirm, especially if the information to prove the statement comes from those making it and they also happen to be the only source of the information.
Hopefully we all agree that getting our “facts” and “truth” from only one source, which in many cases cannot be verified by anyone else is not a great idea.
I will not make a statement without providing the reference and try my best to provide a minimum of 3 collaborating sources.
In many cases the information can only be obtained from the one source like a NASA website for example. I avoid using sources that seem to be in opposition to the subject so you won’t find any links to other “conspiracy” sites but obviously I do come across those sites in my searches so I will take what is said and attempt to find information that collaborates it. If I can’t find anything I don’t dismiss it, I just keep it to the side for now knowing that just because I didn’t find it today doesn’t mean I won’t find something tomorrow.
I would not consider any source as “unreliable” just because it’s a site that is not “official” and at the same time would not consider any source as “credible” just because it’s from the latest scientific study or leading Authority.
6) To show the connection
It’s important to see some of the connections, not only to make sense of the subjects but show their importance.
I hope a quick look at the SITE MAP will show just how many there are. The connections explain the key factors in any story
-WHO
Who is involved? Who was responsible? Who profits or benefits?
-WHAT
What happened? what was the outcome? What will be the flow on effects?
-WHEN
When did it happen and does the sequence of events tell us anything? Does the history timeline show us anything?
-WHERE
Where did it happen and does that place have any significance?
- WHY?
Why would they do that? , Why would they lie? Why does it matter?, Why is it important?
Often the most difficult to understand and I think we tend to ask this question first. If “why” is not clear then the other questions may not get asked but we should all look at things as a whole.
-HOW?
How did they do that? How could they get away with it? How does this affect me? How can it be stopped?
And once more -WHAT
What was the purpose? What is the goal?, What is the proof?, What will come next? What can we do about it?
7) A way to show people I have Researched this
Unfortunately I've had "conversations" with people on social media who I feel never stop and consider that I, or anyone for that matter may have a different point of view to theirs for an actual reason and not just because I woke up one morning and with zero consideration thought to myself (a perfect example) "The Earth is flat".
Yes we all have an opinion / point of view for a reason that is logical to us but it seems if that point of view happens to disagree with "science", contradicts the majority opinion or goes against the official narrative then we simply assume those people are uneducated, easily fooled, have never looked into it or (this next one seems to be the most common) we have looked into it but were unable to understand the content.
So now if I provide a link here I would hope that the content helps them to understand that I have in fact done quite a bit of looking into it.
I'm sure we can all remember doing a report in school or university. You may still do regular research.
Even if you don't I'm sure we can all appreciate that for every sentence I have typed Its possible to have spent hours searching for several references or documents, then time reading it, then making sense of it, then searching for other collaborating references and along the way you have had to filter through the opposing information as well.
I've also spent time looking into a person, looking into a place, looking into a company and searching for the best material I can to provide a known connection to other subjects or even to verify new connections found which will go a long way to making sense of the topic and much more.
I may have only provided 2 or 3 references but this is only because I avoid using "conspiracy sites" as a reference or articles that could be considered "unreliable” sources or articles may lack references of their own or contain information that seems to have an agenda.
It’s often impossible to make connections without having previously researched the other subject. Not only researched it but also retained the information.
In some cases I may suspect it connects to something else or I have to learn about another subject first so will stop where I am, spend as much time as required on the connecting subject first and then come back to where I left off.
Sometimes the joining subject may not seem so important so I just save a link or note it, other times it seems more important then what I was doing so I continue down that path. This would be obvious to anyone looking at some of the pages because many are just links to things I need to look into further or I have lots of information under "To be researched".
You haven't even seen the word documents that are full of notes taken during this process.
I'm often lead down endless paths of footnotes and references. You may have seen some of my screenshots. Look at how many tabs are open. That is just one browser window of as many as my computer can handle without hitting snail mode or crashing altogether.
All of this information is the foundation for my "uninformed opinion".
Using the flat earth example,
I'm simply amazed that some people fail to realize that we are basically all taught the exact same things in school. In many cases word for word, from identical books and identical curriculum.
The exact same information right up to the point where we started tertiary education which is specialized or career specific or chose to enter the workforce.
More than likely we have watched the same science programs, watched the same documentaries, followed the same Facebook groups or popular scientists and read the same articles.
I didn't just wake up one morning and decided its all wrong. And I never actually said I have made a decision or proven any of this, in fact I have admitted several times that I haven't.
The only reason I may question or disagree with the official narrative is simply because I saw something, heard something or was told something that may have seemed farfetched or even outright ridiculous. But I didn't flat out dismiss it (pun intended) and simply gave it chance. I looked into it with an open mind and let the information take me wherever it went.
Sometimes I'm simply entertaining the idea because it’s interesting. We can do that you know..... This is the main reason my circle is small. We will entertain each other’s idea and challenge each point if we have a conflicting idea but in a way that we are simply having a discussion. Nothing said is intended to offend its more of a "but what about this", "Oh I see, But that would mean .....", "Have you seen that" etc.
The main reason I will look into a subject is that I get this feeling that it "makes sense". I think people tend to ignore that feeling and will form opinions based on what others think makes sense or out of fear of being ridiculed. And I do understand, do you think I felt comfortable when my partner asked "what are you watching" (and the content wasn't something that most partners would ask that question for)
During this, what I would call a"non-versation" with a fellow social media user or casual acquaintance, more often than not, something becomes obvious to me..............
They didn't.
They heard the information and made an instant decision to reject it or just never considered that the information they have may be an old wives tale, story, exaggerated or completely fabricated. I care not what their opinion is but next time this happens to you ask the other "why do you think that". If they pause and think for even a little and then say "because" and that is the extent then that is the concern here.
If we know why we think the way we do then great but have we ever really asked ourselves this?
When was the last time you asked this of yourself?
Right now.....Ask yourself "WHY" and if the best you can up with is because "you heard" or because "they say" or because "everyone knows" or because "It’s a known fact" then maybe we should stop to think if that is the best way to form our opinion. After all it is your opinion but wouldn't you like to know why the other disagrees?
I have no issue with being proven wrong or being thought of as crazy or stupid. I am not offended by negative comments from people who don't know me.
Maybe it’s just me, perhaps it’s a crazy thought…….. but I would much rather be wrong or ridiculed by others than be wilfully ignorant.
I wouldn't want to be the person saying "how could I have not seen that coming?"
What about you?
All I can say is that I have never looked deeply into any subject and at the end thought “well that was a total waste of time"
Regardless of the outcome I have always learnt a great deal about the subject.
Once I understood some of the connections and agendas it seemed to flow and every day it becomes clearer that it’s very important we do take the time.